Animated chart examples

Videos like this circulate with no prompt at all, or a single line.

The data table stays on screen while the chart grows from it — the viewer can audit every bar against its row.

A bar race where ranks are interpolated, not teleported: when two bars swap, the falling one dims and passes behind the rising one.

Three numbers count up in sequence and hold together as one frame.

Written the way you would ask Claude Motion — one line, /motion style — but built through the code route so anyone on any plan can run it.

A dashboard that presents itself: four KPI tiles count up, then the trend line draws beneath them.

The honest comparison film: left panel, what Claude Motion asks of you (a Team seat); right panel, the same kind of chart — {{chart}} — rendered with code on any plan.

A résumé that moves: name card, four skill bars filling to their levels, a tools column, and an availability footer.

A SaaS dashboard showcase: KPI cards count up in steps, the main chart draws its own line, and a sources bar splits 62/24/14.

Runs verbatim — a dashboard window that builds itself, KPIs and chart path included.

Tested after the label fixes (iteration 2).

Runs as written — a dense report condensed to stat cards, one chart and one link.

One number, then the chart that earns it.

Visibly different from Wave 1's remotion-bar-race (generic quarterly ranking morph): this race is driven by a giant YEAR counter, an era band across the bottom, and a leader callout pill that flips to NEW LEADER the moment OrbitPods takes the lead in 2024.

One line, three beats: the dip, the turn, the climb.

A team update that respects the meeting: four numbers, one week shape, one takeaway.

The month rail is the idea: twelve dots light as the year passes, so three stats feel like a year, not a list.

Both products are fictional and the scores are illustrative — the film says so in the kicker and the footer, because a comparison chart that hides that is an ad pretending to be data.

A poll film must pass its own arithmetic: 42 + 28 + 19 + 11 = 100, and the bars share one scale (track = 100%).

A sample story, labelled as one from the first frame: Fernline is fictional, the milestones are illustrative, and the film never claims otherwise.

One number, one hook: the stat counts up, the label explains it, the CTA closes it.

The demo numbers are invented for the test run (the prompt's own printed examples are illustrative).

The prompt's printed example data is shorthand (endpoints only — "Jan to Jul, 1,200 to 5,200"); our run spells out a full seven-month series with the same endpoints, so the chart can be drawn without inventing or smoothing values mid-run.

Written and run as specified: the ring is pure stroke-dasharray maths from the parsed segment string, so swapping the data redraws the donut, the count-up and the legend percentages together.

The prompt treats label placement as a computed layout problem — mid-angle anchors plus frame clamping — because freehand callouts are where pie films fall apart.

One baseline and one scale are stated three times in this prompt — direction, structure and gotchas — because per-bar scaling is the silent lie stacked charts tell.